<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1192 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179537</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT (Appeals) decision that software expenses were revenue expenditure, not capital, allowing them as business expenses. The expenses were for customization and upgrading existing software, providing no enduring benefit. The ITAT also upheld the CIT (Appeals) decision on international travel expenses, deeming them allowable for business purposes, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 18:48:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1192 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179537</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT (Appeals) decision that software expenses were revenue expenditure, not capital, allowing them as business expenses. The expenses were for customization and upgrading existing software, providing no enduring benefit. The ITAT also upheld the CIT (Appeals) decision on international travel expenses, deeming them allowable for business purposes, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>