<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 483 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179515</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed by the AO and sustained by the CIT(A), allowing the appeal of the assessee. The disallowance of Dmat charges and service tax as business expenses did not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income, leading to the cancellation of the penalty under section 271(1)(c).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 13:22:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 483 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179515</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed by the AO and sustained by the CIT(A), allowing the appeal of the assessee. The disallowance of Dmat charges and service tax as business expenses did not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income, leading to the cancellation of the penalty under section 271(1)(c).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>