https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179512 The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, setting aside the orders of the Assessing Officer (AO) and Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP). The case involved concerns of bias in the DRP due to the jurisdictional Commissioner's presence, rejection of contentions on remuneration of the Indian entity, and denial of cross-examination rights. The AO was directed to conduct a fresh examination, considering the remuneration issue and allowing cross-examination. The DRP was instructed to reconsider objections without the jurisdictional Commissioner, ensuring fair assessment procedures and upholding natural justice principles. en-us Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Mar 2016 12:41:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179512 The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, setting aside the orders of the Assessing Officer (AO) and Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP). The case involved concerns of bias in the DRP due to the jurisdictional Commissioner's presence, rejection of contentions on remuneration of the Indian entity, and denial of cross-examination rights. The AO was directed to conduct a fresh examination, considering the remuneration issue and allowing cross-examination. The DRP was instructed to reconsider objections without the jurisdictional Commissioner, ensuring fair assessment procedures and upholding natural justice principles. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179512