<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (8) TMI 86 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179507</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of section 16(3)(a)(iv) under article 14 of the Constitution, ruling in favor of including the dividend income of the divided minor son in the total income of the assessee. The court emphasized the legislative purpose of preventing tax evasion through transfers to minor children and highlighted the distinction between minor sons and married minor daughters in controlling income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 11:30:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (8) TMI 86 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179507</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of section 16(3)(a)(iv) under article 14 of the Constitution, ruling in favor of including the dividend income of the divided minor son in the total income of the assessee. The court emphasized the legislative purpose of preventing tax evasion through transfers to minor children and highlighted the distinction between minor sons and married minor daughters in controlling income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>