<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 85 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272273</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not justified for the assessment year 2008-09 as the cash receipts from the sale of flats were not taxable in that year, despite being disclosed by the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalties by the CIT(A) and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 11:14:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 85 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272273</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not justified for the assessment year 2008-09 as the cash receipts from the sale of flats were not taxable in that year, despite being disclosed by the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalties by the CIT(A) and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>