<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 84 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272272</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to the deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act. The grounds raised by the assessee were allowed, and the appeal was decided in favor of the assessee. The tribunal emphasized the importance of judicial precedents and the principle of &quot;impossibility of performance&quot; in its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2016 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 84 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272272</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to the deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act. The grounds raised by the assessee were allowed, and the appeal was decided in favor of the assessee. The tribunal emphasized the importance of judicial precedents and the principle of &quot;impossibility of performance&quot; in its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>