<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 80 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272268</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee regarding the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) and the additions made by the Assessing Officer. Relief was granted in certain aspects, such as the disallowance of depreciation under section 80IB and the addition under section 69C on account of expenditure. However, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was upheld in part, with the Tribunal directing the Assessing Officer to recompute the penalty for sustained additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 11:14:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 80 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272268</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee regarding the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) and the additions made by the Assessing Officer. Relief was granted in certain aspects, such as the disallowance of depreciation under section 80IB and the addition under section 69C on account of expenditure. However, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was upheld in part, with the Tribunal directing the Assessing Officer to recompute the penalty for sustained additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>