<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 79 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272267</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 15,28,384 as unexplained expenditure under Section 69C due to insufficient evidence. The appeal regarding the disallowance of car insurance, conveyance, and telephone expenses was partially allowed, reducing the disallowance to 10%. The final decision partially favored the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 11:14:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 79 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272267</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 15,28,384 as unexplained expenditure under Section 69C due to insufficient evidence. The appeal regarding the disallowance of car insurance, conveyance, and telephone expenses was partially allowed, reducing the disallowance to 10%. The final decision partially favored the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>