<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 55 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2522</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (A) upheld the demand for Service tax, emphasizing that the issue of a consignment note is mandatory for the transportation of goods, as it signifies a commercial activity. The Commissioner dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower adjudicating authority&#039;s decision. The liability to discharge Service tax in the absence of a consignment note was confirmed, and compliance with Notification No. 35/2004 dated 3-12-2004 was deemed necessary, with strict adherence to statutory provisions emphasized.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 55 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2522</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (A) upheld the demand for Service tax, emphasizing that the issue of a consignment note is mandatory for the transportation of goods, as it signifies a commercial activity. The Commissioner dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower adjudicating authority&#039;s decision. The liability to discharge Service tax in the absence of a consignment note was confirmed, and compliance with Notification No. 35/2004 dated 3-12-2004 was deemed necessary, with strict adherence to statutory provisions emphasized.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>