https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179487 A mere deemed purchaser whose Chapter III purchase proceedings were dropped and never crystallised cannot invoke Section 43-1IE to defeat a landlord's right under Chapter III-AA. The Supreme Court held that the exclusion in Section 43-1IE applies only where the tenant's purchase has been completed and the purchaser's rights have crystallised. Because the earlier order dropping the Section 32G proceedings had become final, the tenant could not be treated as a tenant whose land had already been purchased. The armed-forces landlord therefore retained the statutory right to terminate the tenancy and recover possession, and the High Court judgment was set aside. en-us Wed, 18 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Mar 2016 11:12:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179487 A mere deemed purchaser whose Chapter III purchase proceedings were dropped and never crystallised cannot invoke Section 43-1IE to defeat a landlord's right under Chapter III-AA. The Supreme Court held that the exclusion in Section 43-1IE applies only where the tenant's purchase has been completed and the purchaser's rights have crystallised. Because the earlier order dropping the Section 32G proceedings had become final, the tenant could not be treated as a tenant whose land had already been purchased. The armed-forces landlord therefore retained the statutory right to terminate the tenancy and recover possession, and the High Court judgment was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179487