<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1143 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179492</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) Nhava Sheva for fresh adjudication, clarifying jurisdictional issues and directing the Adjudicating Authority in Delhi to expedite the decision process. The appellant was instructed to submit a Provisional Duty (PD) bond instead of paying additional Extra Duty Deposit (EDD). The appeals were disposed of accordingly, with the order to be sent to DGOV Mumbai for reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 11:12:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1143 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179492</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) Nhava Sheva for fresh adjudication, clarifying jurisdictional issues and directing the Adjudicating Authority in Delhi to expedite the decision process. The appellant was instructed to submit a Provisional Duty (PD) bond instead of paying additional Extra Duty Deposit (EDD). The appeals were disposed of accordingly, with the order to be sent to DGOV Mumbai for reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>