<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 110 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2520</link>
    <description>The appellants were directed to pre-deposit 50% of the respective duty amounts within a specified timeline. The judgment highlighted the complexities surrounding the use of CENVAT credit for paying Service Tax on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) service and the interpretation of relevant provisions under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 110 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2520</link>
      <description>The appellants were directed to pre-deposit 50% of the respective duty amounts within a specified timeline. The judgment highlighted the complexities surrounding the use of CENVAT credit for paying Service Tax on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) service and the interpretation of relevant provisions under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>