<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 63 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272251</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed redemption of the imported consignment of &quot;Old and Used Tyres&quot; on payment of a fine of 15% of the declared value and reduced the penalty to Rs. 30,000. It held that MOEF permission was not necessary for clearance of such goods, citing a previous decision. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the Appellant, with the consignment permitted for redemption based on the precedent established in a similar case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2016 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 63 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272251</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed redemption of the imported consignment of &quot;Old and Used Tyres&quot; on payment of a fine of 15% of the declared value and reduced the penalty to Rs. 30,000. It held that MOEF permission was not necessary for clearance of such goods, citing a previous decision. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the Appellant, with the consignment permitted for redemption based on the precedent established in a similar case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>