https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272248 The Court upheld the decision that the Company Court correctly refused jurisdiction under Section 392 of the Companies Act, 1956 for claims against third parties not involved in the original Scheme of Arrangement. It was concluded that disputes involving third parties should be resolved in ordinary civil courts. The appeals were dismissed without costs. en-us Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Mar 2016 11:04:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272248 The Court upheld the decision that the Company Court correctly refused jurisdiction under Section 392 of the Companies Act, 1956 for claims against third parties not involved in the original Scheme of Arrangement. It was concluded that disputes involving third parties should be resolved in ordinary civil courts. The appeals were dismissed without costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272248