https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2511 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the demand of service tax on broadcasting services provided by them. The Tribunal found that the inclusive part of the definition of "broadcasting" under the Finance Act, 1994 did not apply to the appellants as the broadcasting company they dealt with did not have its Head Office outside India. As a result, the Tribunal waived the tax demand and penalties, granting a stay of recovery and expediting the appeal hearing. en-us Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2511 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the demand of service tax on broadcasting services provided by them. The Tribunal found that the inclusive part of the definition of "broadcasting" under the Finance Act, 1994 did not apply to the appellants as the broadcasting company they dealt with did not have its Head Office outside India. As a result, the Tribunal waived the tax demand and penalties, granting a stay of recovery and expediting the appeal hearing. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2511