<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 873 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179469</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal remitted the appeals back to the CIT(A) for assessment years 2005-06, 2006-07, and 2007-08, instructing the CIT(A) to consider the assessee&#039;s application for condonation of delay and make decisions based on the evidence provided. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had not considered the condonation application in the assessment year 2005-06, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Consequently, all appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, granting the assessee another opportunity to present evidence for condonation of delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2016 16:53:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 873 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179469</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal remitted the appeals back to the CIT(A) for assessment years 2005-06, 2006-07, and 2007-08, instructing the CIT(A) to consider the assessee&#039;s application for condonation of delay and make decisions based on the evidence provided. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had not considered the condonation application in the assessment year 2005-06, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Consequently, all appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, granting the assessee another opportunity to present evidence for condonation of delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>