<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 785 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179466</link>
    <description>For depreciation under Appendix I to the Income-tax Rules, 1962, the relevant test is whether the asset answers the description of an aeroplane, not its size or passenger capacity. An aircraft with fixed wings and propulsion by jets or propellers falls within the specific aeroplane entry and is not confined to the general plant and machinery category. The Tribunal followed its earlier view, which had been affirmed by the jurisdictional High Court, and found no contrary material. Accordingly, the assessee was entitled to depreciation at 40% on the aircraft, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the depreciation rate failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2016 16:17:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 785 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179466</link>
      <description>For depreciation under Appendix I to the Income-tax Rules, 1962, the relevant test is whether the asset answers the description of an aeroplane, not its size or passenger capacity. An aircraft with fixed wings and propulsion by jets or propellers falls within the specific aeroplane entry and is not confined to the general plant and machinery category. The Tribunal followed its earlier view, which had been affirmed by the jurisdictional High Court, and found no contrary material. Accordingly, the assessee was entitled to depreciation at 40% on the aircraft, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the depreciation rate failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>