<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 96 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2507</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit under the excise scheme must be claimed on the prescribed invoice copy, and a photocopy of an extra invoice copy is not a valid substitute. Where the duplicate invoice copy is lost, credit can be claimed only in the manner recognised by the rules; the Evidence Act does not convert a photocopy into an admissible document for duty credit purposes. Relying on prior precedent and the departmental circular, the Tribunal held that acceptance of such photocopies would undermine the discipline of the credit scheme. Credit on the photocopy was therefore inadmissible, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 96 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2507</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit under the excise scheme must be claimed on the prescribed invoice copy, and a photocopy of an extra invoice copy is not a valid substitute. Where the duplicate invoice copy is lost, credit can be claimed only in the manner recognised by the rules; the Evidence Act does not convert a photocopy into an admissible document for duty credit purposes. Relying on prior precedent and the departmental circular, the Tribunal held that acceptance of such photocopies would undermine the discipline of the credit scheme. Credit on the photocopy was therefore inadmissible, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>