<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 92 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2502</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 on a Foreign based Company. It found the penalties inapplicable to the Foreign Company based on legal interpretations and previous cases, ruling that the service tax liability rested with the Indian Company. The appeal was allowed, and the penalties were revoked based on the agreement terms and legal citations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 92 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2502</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 on a Foreign based Company. It found the penalties inapplicable to the Foreign Company based on legal interpretations and previous cases, ruling that the service tax liability rested with the Indian Company. The appeal was allowed, and the penalties were revoked based on the agreement terms and legal citations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>