<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1046 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179446</link>
    <description>The Commission invalidated the First Appellate Authority&#039;s order for procedural violations and directed the respondent authority to provide the requested information under the RTI Act. It emphasized the importance of proactive disclosure and a balanced approach to handling voluminous RTI requests, highlighting the necessity of adhering to natural justice principles and the RTI Act&#039;s provisions to ensure transparency and accountability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 May 2016 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1046 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179446</link>
      <description>The Commission invalidated the First Appellate Authority&#039;s order for procedural violations and directed the respondent authority to provide the requested information under the RTI Act. It emphasized the importance of proactive disclosure and a balanced approach to handling voluminous RTI requests, highlighting the necessity of adhering to natural justice principles and the RTI Act&#039;s provisions to ensure transparency and accountability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>