<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 55 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272243</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to apply the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method for transfer pricing adjustments, dismissing the appeals. The Court emphasized the importance of the assessee providing reasonable explanations for transactions, supporting the Tribunal&#039;s scrutiny and adjustments. Both issues raised were decided against the assessee in favor of the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 55 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272243</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to apply the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method for transfer pricing adjustments, dismissing the appeals. The Court emphasized the importance of the assessee providing reasonable explanations for transactions, supporting the Tribunal&#039;s scrutiny and adjustments. Both issues raised were decided against the assessee in favor of the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>