<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 49 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272237</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the interest income was linked to the construction of a power plant and should be capitalized, not taxed as income from other sources. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, confirming that the interest income should reduce the project&#039;s cost. The judgment highlighted the significance of the connection between the interest income and the project setup, distinguishing it from cases where interest on surplus funds was taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2016 08:42:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 49 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272237</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the interest income was linked to the construction of a power plant and should be capitalized, not taxed as income from other sources. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, confirming that the interest income should reduce the project&#039;s cost. The judgment highlighted the significance of the connection between the interest income and the project setup, distinguishing it from cases where interest on surplus funds was taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>