<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 34 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272222</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the refund claim for a Mercedes Benz Car due to the appellant&#039;s failure to challenge the assessment order before filing for a refund. Despite arguments regarding vehicle registration and supporting documents, the Tribunal emphasized the legal requirement to challenge assessment orders before claiming refunds. Relying on Supreme Court judgments and previous Tribunal decisions, the appeal was rejected based on established legal principles, disregarding the appellant&#039;s contentions and references to Circulars and High Court orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2016 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 34 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272222</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the refund claim for a Mercedes Benz Car due to the appellant&#039;s failure to challenge the assessment order before filing for a refund. Despite arguments regarding vehicle registration and supporting documents, the Tribunal emphasized the legal requirement to challenge assessment orders before claiming refunds. Relying on Supreme Court judgments and previous Tribunal decisions, the appeal was rejected based on established legal principles, disregarding the appellant&#039;s contentions and references to Circulars and High Court orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>