<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Citation of case law</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=109965</link>
    <description>M/s F S Engineers v. CCE (CESTAT Ahmedabad, 2013) held that utilisation of cenvat credit recorded in statutory books does not constitute non payment of duty; revenue loss is limited to interest for the period between credit utilisation and cash payment, and penalty under Rule 25 is not attracted, a formulation summarized in the forum as &quot;Non-imposition of penalty is no revenue loss.&quot;</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2016 08:13:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:56:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Citation of case law</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=109965</link>
      <description>M/s F S Engineers v. CCE (CESTAT Ahmedabad, 2013) held that utilisation of cenvat credit recorded in statutory books does not constitute non payment of duty; revenue loss is limited to interest for the period between credit utilisation and cash payment, and penalty under Rule 25 is not attracted, a formulation summarized in the forum as &quot;Non-imposition of penalty is no revenue loss.&quot;</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2016 08:13:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=109965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>