<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Tribunal&#039;s Best Judgment Assessment; Assessee-Appellant Fails to Prove Arbitrary or Irrational Approach.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27629</link>
    <description>Best judgment assessment - justification of estimation of seats - when learned counsel for the assessee-appellant has not been able to satisfy this court that the approach of the Tribunal is arbitrary or irrational, no advantage flows to the assessee-appellant from those pronouncements - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 20:29:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 20:29:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Tribunal&#039;s Best Judgment Assessment; Assessee-Appellant Fails to Prove Arbitrary or Irrational Approach.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27629</link>
      <description>Best judgment assessment - justification of estimation of seats - when learned counsel for the assessee-appellant has not been able to satisfy this court that the approach of the Tribunal is arbitrary or irrational, no advantage flows to the assessee-appellant from those pronouncements - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 20:29:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>