https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179439 An appellate court must decide applications for additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC on merits before disposing of the appeal, assessing necessity for judgment, admissible grounds, and whether the request is merely to fill gaps. Where both sides seek to rely on further material, those applications must be determined first and the appeal decided only thereafter. A prior decision cannot control remanded proceedings if it conflicts with specific remand directions already issued. The impugned judgment was set aside and the matter remanded to the High Court for fresh disposal after deciding the additional evidence applications in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Mar 2016 17:47:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179439 An appellate court must decide applications for additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC on merits before disposing of the appeal, assessing necessity for judgment, admissible grounds, and whether the request is merely to fill gaps. Where both sides seek to rely on further material, those applications must be determined first and the appeal decided only thereafter. A prior decision cannot control remanded proceedings if it conflicts with specific remand directions already issued. The impugned judgment was set aside and the matter remanded to the High Court for fresh disposal after deciding the additional evidence applications in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179439