<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (1) TMI 277 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179438</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment declaring the appellant&#039;s election void, and dismissed the election petition. The appellant was awarded costs of Rs. 10,000 payable by the election petitioner. The Court emphasized the necessity of precise and clear pleadings containing all necessary details and particulars as required by law, and found the evidence presented to be inadmissible and unreliable in proving corrupt practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 17:41:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (1) TMI 277 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179438</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment declaring the appellant&#039;s election void, and dismissed the election petition. The appellant was awarded costs of Rs. 10,000 payable by the election petitioner. The Court emphasized the necessity of precise and clear pleadings containing all necessary details and particulars as required by law, and found the evidence presented to be inadmissible and unreliable in proving corrupt practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>