<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 635 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179431</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on both issues. The first issue regarding the disallowance of interest under the SEBI Interest Regulation Scheme was found to be a question of fact, and the decision of the ITAT was upheld. The second issue concerning VSAT charges and lease line charges was not entertained due to a similar previous dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 16:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 635 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179431</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on both issues. The first issue regarding the disallowance of interest under the SEBI Interest Regulation Scheme was found to be a question of fact, and the decision of the ITAT was upheld. The second issue concerning VSAT charges and lease line charges was not entertained due to a similar previous dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>