<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1391 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179424</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for A.Ys. 2005-06 &amp;amp; 2006-07, holding that no penalty was leviable under Section 271(1)(c) due to assessment under Section 115JB and the absence of tax evasion. The penalty was deleted as concealment under Section 271(1)(c) could not be imposed when assessed under Section 115JB, based on legal precedent and lack of contrary decisions presented by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 14:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1391 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179424</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for A.Ys. 2005-06 &amp;amp; 2006-07, holding that no penalty was leviable under Section 271(1)(c) due to assessment under Section 115JB and the absence of tax evasion. The penalty was deleted as concealment under Section 271(1)(c) could not be imposed when assessed under Section 115JB, based on legal precedent and lack of contrary decisions presented by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>