<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 62 - HIGH COURT , MADHYA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2484</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, challenging the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the purchase and sale of plots by the assessee. The Court held that the Commissioner&#039;s order invoking revisionary powers under section 263 was not sustainable after the Tribunal set aside the co-owner&#039;s case, which formed the basis of the Commissioner&#039;s decision. Emphasizing the Assessing Officer&#039;s prior consideration of the matter and the inconsistency of orders on the same sale by co-owners, the Court found no merit in the appeal and dismissed it without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 62 - HIGH COURT , MADHYA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2484</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, challenging the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the purchase and sale of plots by the assessee. The Court held that the Commissioner&#039;s order invoking revisionary powers under section 263 was not sustainable after the Tribunal set aside the co-owner&#039;s case, which formed the basis of the Commissioner&#039;s decision. Emphasizing the Assessing Officer&#039;s prior consideration of the matter and the inconsistency of orders on the same sale by co-owners, the Court found no merit in the appeal and dismissed it without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>