<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 945 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179410</link>
    <description>Business expenditure principles support deduction of rural development spending benefiting factory-area workers, actuarially valued contractual leave-salary liability, and debenture restructuring costs that create no capital asset; spreading such revenue expenditure over future periods is not warranted. Depreciation on acquired goodwill was treated consistently with prior-year treatment. Section 10B relief could not be reduced by allocating head-office or other-division expenses and interest income to the eligible unit, nor withdrawn in a later year where the initial allowance remained undisturbed and facts were unchanged. Export deduction and sales-tax exemption issues required recomputation or adjudication under applicable law. MODVAT valuation followed consistent prior treatment, section 14A restriction remained undisturbed, and interest computation required reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2022 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 945 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179410</link>
      <description>Business expenditure principles support deduction of rural development spending benefiting factory-area workers, actuarially valued contractual leave-salary liability, and debenture restructuring costs that create no capital asset; spreading such revenue expenditure over future periods is not warranted. Depreciation on acquired goodwill was treated consistently with prior-year treatment. Section 10B relief could not be reduced by allocating head-office or other-division expenses and interest income to the eligible unit, nor withdrawn in a later year where the initial allowance remained undisturbed and facts were unchanged. Export deduction and sales-tax exemption issues required recomputation or adjudication under applicable law. MODVAT valuation followed consistent prior treatment, section 14A restriction remained undisturbed, and interest computation required reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>