<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 28 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272216</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the orders of the CIT(A) and the Assessing Officer, confirming the penalty and rejecting the rectification application. The appeal was dismissed as the concurrent findings of the authorities were considered legal and not perverse, with no substantial question of law necessitating court intervention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 15:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 28 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272216</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the orders of the CIT(A) and the Assessing Officer, confirming the penalty and rejecting the rectification application. The appeal was dismissed as the concurrent findings of the authorities were considered legal and not perverse, with no substantial question of law necessitating court intervention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>