<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 27 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272215</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the applicability of Section 50C to the sale deed dated 10.05.2005, making the capital gains taxable in the assessment year 2006-07. The appellant&#039;s reliance on Explanation 2 to Section 2(47) was dismissed, as the appellant had already claimed capital gains for the assessment year 2006-07. The appeal was dismissed, and the substantial question of law was answered against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 27 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272215</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the applicability of Section 50C to the sale deed dated 10.05.2005, making the capital gains taxable in the assessment year 2006-07. The appellant&#039;s reliance on Explanation 2 to Section 2(47) was dismissed, as the appellant had already claimed capital gains for the assessment year 2006-07. The appeal was dismissed, and the substantial question of law was answered against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>