<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 19 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272207</link>
    <description>The appeals for Assessment Year (AY) 2009-10 were dismissed, and the appeal for AY 2011-12 was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the decisions on the application of Net Profit (NP) rates, treatment of hire charges and interest income, and deletion of disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia). Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed a lump sum addition for AY 2011-12 due to the decline in NP rate and lack of proper books.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 11:41:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 19 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272207</link>
      <description>The appeals for Assessment Year (AY) 2009-10 were dismissed, and the appeal for AY 2011-12 was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the decisions on the application of Net Profit (NP) rates, treatment of hire charges and interest income, and deletion of disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia). Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed a lump sum addition for AY 2011-12 due to the decline in NP rate and lack of proper books.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>