<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 16 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272204</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for the wrong claim of deduction under Section 10B on interest income. The Tribunal found the Assessee&#039;s explanation to be bonafide, with all income details disclosed, and deemed the issue debatable, preventing penalty imposition. The Tribunal referenced a Delhi High Court ruling that concealment in regular assessment does not justify such a penalty. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming the deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 11:41:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 16 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272204</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for the wrong claim of deduction under Section 10B on interest income. The Tribunal found the Assessee&#039;s explanation to be bonafide, with all income details disclosed, and deemed the issue debatable, preventing penalty imposition. The Tribunal referenced a Delhi High Court ruling that concealment in regular assessment does not justify such a penalty. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming the deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>