<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 9 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272197</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision allowing the adjustment of duty excess paid by the assessee against duty short-paid, citing legal precedents and majority decisions. The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the validity of the adjustment and the legality of suo motto refunds was rejected. The Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue&#039;s arguments and concluded that the adjustment was justified. Additionally, concerns raised by the Revenue regarding the duty burden passed on to customers without proper evidence were dismissed. The Tribunal&#039;s decision favored the assessee, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected on all grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 9 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272197</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision allowing the adjustment of duty excess paid by the assessee against duty short-paid, citing legal precedents and majority decisions. The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the validity of the adjustment and the legality of suo motto refunds was rejected. The Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue&#039;s arguments and concluded that the adjustment was justified. Additionally, concerns raised by the Revenue regarding the duty burden passed on to customers without proper evidence were dismissed. The Tribunal&#039;s decision favored the assessee, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected on all grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>