<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1180 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179407</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed ITA Nos. 835 &amp;amp; 2126/Del/09 and fully allowed ITA No. 2127/Del/09. The reassessment order was quashed, and the additions made by the Commissioner under section 263 were deleted. The Tribunal found that the advances received were genuine, the reassessment proceedings were invalid for one year, and the additions made by the Commissioner were not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 11:27:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=418381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1180 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179407</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed ITA Nos. 835 &amp;amp; 2126/Del/09 and fully allowed ITA No. 2127/Del/09. The reassessment order was quashed, and the additions made by the Commissioner under section 263 were deleted. The Tribunal found that the advances received were genuine, the reassessment proceedings were invalid for one year, and the additions made by the Commissioner were not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>