<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 13 - High Court, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2477</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Department. The Court upheld the decision to set aside the penalty orders for the assessment years in question, emphasizing that the assessee had provided full and accurate information regarding the transactions, and there was no concealment of facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 13 - High Court, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2477</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Department. The Court upheld the decision to set aside the penalty orders for the assessment years in question, emphasizing that the assessee had provided full and accurate information regarding the transactions, and there was no concealment of facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>