<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 3 - HIGH COURT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2475</link>
    <description>Criminal prosecution initiated solely on the basis of a penalty order under section 271(1)(c) could not continue once that penalty order was set aside by the ITAT. The High Court applied the settled principle that, where the foundation order is annulled, the complaint loses its basis and becomes unsustainable. The criminal complaint and all consequential proceedings were therefore quashed in favour of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 3 - HIGH COURT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2475</link>
      <description>Criminal prosecution initiated solely on the basis of a penalty order under section 271(1)(c) could not continue once that penalty order was set aside by the ITAT. The High Court applied the settled principle that, where the foundation order is annulled, the complaint loses its basis and becomes unsustainable. The criminal complaint and all consequential proceedings were therefore quashed in favour of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>