<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 103 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2453</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, NEW DELHI held that the appellant, a Security Services provider, was liable to pay service tax from 16-10-1998 despite registering in 2001. Penalties under various sections of the Finance Act, 1994 were imposed, with adjustments made to some penalties. The appellant was directed to pay the remaining tax amount within six weeks, with a waiver of penalty contingent on payment. Failure to comply would result in appeal dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 103 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2453</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, NEW DELHI held that the appellant, a Security Services provider, was liable to pay service tax from 16-10-1998 despite registering in 2001. Penalties under various sections of the Finance Act, 1994 were imposed, with adjustments made to some penalties. The appellant was directed to pay the remaining tax amount within six weeks, with a waiver of penalty contingent on payment. Failure to comply would result in appeal dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>