<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 423 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2452</link>
    <description>A debatable issue arose on eligibility of service tax credit for telephone services used in connection with mandap keeper services, especially where no separate account was maintained. The authorities questioned the credit claim based on the telephone&#039;s location at the reception counter, while the appellant relied on the credit rules allowing limited utilisation and the broad statutory scope of mandap keeper service. On a prima facie view, the telephone connection was treated as capable of meeting the rule&#039;s requirements, making the dispute fit for appellate consideration. Partial waiver of pre-deposit was therefore granted, subject to a deposit of Rs. 10,000, and the balance demand and penalty were stayed pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 423 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2452</link>
      <description>A debatable issue arose on eligibility of service tax credit for telephone services used in connection with mandap keeper services, especially where no separate account was maintained. The authorities questioned the credit claim based on the telephone&#039;s location at the reception counter, while the appellant relied on the credit rules allowing limited utilisation and the broad statutory scope of mandap keeper service. On a prima facie view, the telephone connection was treated as capable of meeting the rule&#039;s requirements, making the dispute fit for appellate consideration. Partial waiver of pre-deposit was therefore granted, subject to a deposit of Rs. 10,000, and the balance demand and penalty were stayed pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>