<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 481 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179397</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, thereby deleting the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for both excess depreciation and the alleged fund transfer from M/s R.K. Video Distributor. The Tribunal held that the assessee had not concealed any income and that the discrepancies were matters of opinion, citing relevant case law to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 481 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179397</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, thereby deleting the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for both excess depreciation and the alleged fund transfer from M/s R.K. Video Distributor. The Tribunal held that the assessee had not concealed any income and that the discrepancies were matters of opinion, citing relevant case law to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>