<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 996 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179391</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s claim for extra depreciation on computer peripherals, allowing depreciation at 60% by considering them integral to the computer system. The disallowance of TDS on payments made to NSE was overturned as the payments were not subject to TDS provisions. The Tribunal remitted the restriction of rebate under Section 88E back to the Assessing Officer for proper reconsideration, emphasizing the requirement for adequate evidence and giving the assessee a fair opportunity to be heard. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the cross objection by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:08:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 996 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179391</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s claim for extra depreciation on computer peripherals, allowing depreciation at 60% by considering them integral to the computer system. The disallowance of TDS on payments made to NSE was overturned as the payments were not subject to TDS provisions. The Tribunal remitted the restriction of rebate under Section 88E back to the Assessing Officer for proper reconsideration, emphasizing the requirement for adequate evidence and giving the assessee a fair opportunity to be heard. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the cross objection by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>