<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 884 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272179</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the deduction under Section 80IB(10) on a proportionate basis for the completed portions of the housing project &quot;Kumar Paradise.&quot; The Tribunal emphasized the legislative intent to encourage residential development and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, affirming the deduction for the completed units of the project.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 01:09:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 884 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272179</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the deduction under Section 80IB(10) on a proportionate basis for the completed portions of the housing project &quot;Kumar Paradise.&quot; The Tribunal emphasized the legislative intent to encourage residential development and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, affirming the deduction for the completed units of the project.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>