<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 881 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272176</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, affirming the application of section 50C for calculating Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) and granting partial relief under section 54F for the purchase of a new plot. However, the claim for construction expenses was disallowed due to insufficient evidence and legal restrictions. The interest charged under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was not specifically addressed in detail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 01:09:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 881 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272176</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, affirming the application of section 50C for calculating Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) and granting partial relief under section 54F for the purchase of a new plot. However, the claim for construction expenses was disallowed due to insufficient evidence and legal restrictions. The interest charged under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was not specifically addressed in detail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>