<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 870 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272165</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the order seeking rectification of a mistake in an earlier order, ruling that the original order dated 30.04.2008 was invalid as it was issued without granting a personal hearing despite the respondent&#039;s request. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper procedures and noted that the failure to provide a personal hearing constituted an error apparent from the records. Consequently, the impugned order was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed based on legal precedents and principles discussed in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 18:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 870 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272165</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the order seeking rectification of a mistake in an earlier order, ruling that the original order dated 30.04.2008 was invalid as it was issued without granting a personal hearing despite the respondent&#039;s request. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper procedures and noted that the failure to provide a personal hearing constituted an error apparent from the records. Consequently, the impugned order was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed based on legal precedents and principles discussed in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>