https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272160 The case involved the admissibility of cenvat credit on outdoor catering services. The Member (Judicial) found that while outdoor catering service is an admissible input service, cenvat credit can only be allowed on the portion of the cost borne by the manufacturer, excluding the portion recovered from employees. The matter was remanded to determine the amount recovered from employees and to quantify the allowable credit. Emphasizing the intertwined nature of the issues, the Member highlighted the need for a fair opportunity for the respondent in the adjudication process and disposed of the appeal through remand for further proceedings. en-us Thu, 31 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Oct 2016 14:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272160 The case involved the admissibility of cenvat credit on outdoor catering services. The Member (Judicial) found that while outdoor catering service is an admissible input service, cenvat credit can only be allowed on the portion of the cost borne by the manufacturer, excluding the portion recovered from employees. The matter was remanded to determine the amount recovered from employees and to quantify the allowable credit. Emphasizing the intertwined nature of the issues, the Member highlighted the need for a fair opportunity for the respondent in the adjudication process and disposed of the appeal through remand for further proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 31 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272160