https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272156 The High Court directed the petitioners to file an appeal against the final findings and notification challenging the imposition of anti-dumping duty on Purified Terephthalic Acid (PTA) from Thailand and Korea. The court clarified that no anti-dumping duty can be levied or collected during the "gap period" between the lapse of provisional duty and the imposition of final duty, in line with the Supreme Court decision in Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore v. G.M. Exports. The judgment stressed adherence to this ruling to prevent any duty imposition during the "gap period." en-us Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Feb 2016 01:07:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272156 The High Court directed the petitioners to file an appeal against the final findings and notification challenging the imposition of anti-dumping duty on Purified Terephthalic Acid (PTA) from Thailand and Korea. The court clarified that no anti-dumping duty can be levied or collected during the "gap period" between the lapse of provisional duty and the imposition of final duty, in line with the Supreme Court decision in Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore v. G.M. Exports. The judgment stressed adherence to this ruling to prevent any duty imposition during the "gap period." Case-Laws Customs Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272156