<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 855 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272150</link>
    <description>A composite product is classified by its principal function and essential character, assessed from the tariff headings, Section Notes and commercial understanding. The advance ruling found that the imported Galaxy K Zoom was marketed and perceived as a smart phone, with camera features remaining ancillary to its communication function. Higher megapixel capability, optical zoom and image-capture features did not displace its primary character as a mobile phone. It was therefore classified as a telephone under Customs Tariff Heading 8517 and not as a digital camera under Heading 8525, and the related exemption issue fell away once that classification was adopted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 855 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272150</link>
      <description>A composite product is classified by its principal function and essential character, assessed from the tariff headings, Section Notes and commercial understanding. The advance ruling found that the imported Galaxy K Zoom was marketed and perceived as a smart phone, with camera features remaining ancillary to its communication function. Higher megapixel capability, optical zoom and image-capture features did not displace its primary character as a mobile phone. It was therefore classified as a telephone under Customs Tariff Heading 8517 and not as a digital camera under Heading 8525, and the related exemption issue fell away once that classification was adopted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>