<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 849 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272144</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter to the original adjudicating authority to examine the nexus between input and output services and upheld the time-bar for part of the refund claim. The relevant date for calculating the limitation period for refund claims in the case of export of services is the date on which the consideration is received. Both appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2016 14:49:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 849 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272144</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter to the original adjudicating authority to examine the nexus between input and output services and upheld the time-bar for part of the refund claim. The relevant date for calculating the limitation period for refund claims in the case of export of services is the date on which the consideration is received. Both appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>